Bigger-Picture Windows on the
world Essays |
Proof
of the Pudding
We all have our own
personal belief-system, carefully honed over many years of reading, studying and
living. But try sharing it with someone else and the blunt rejoinder is likely
to be: "Can you prove it?" Attempting to prove it is often not helpful
to either party, and I would like to suggest an alternative response.
Question of proof
First of all, what do we mean by proof? Scientific theories are usually
presented as facts, and we do not ask for proof because we stand in awe of
science. The moon is so many miles distant from the earth. Wow! But science is
constantly modifying its pronouncements without ever admitting that the last lot
were inaccurate. Taking on board the scientific claims on diet and life style
over the last fifty years would have involved a bewildering number of U-turns.
Religion offers similar statements in the name of god, but god usually changes
his mind (slavery, women’s rights, homosexuality etc.) shortly after the
changes are reflected in society.
I am not being critical of men of science or men of god, just trying to say that
our own personal beliefs might be equally valid without any onus of proof. In
fact, we live our lives not according to proven facts but in line with expected
probabilities. We might not live to benefit from them but we take out pension
schemes on the probability that we will. We dedicate a large part of our lives
to an imagined future without any prior thought of seeking proof. So when it
comes to spiritual beliefs, forget proof and start talking probabilities.
Proof or probability?
The most fundamental question we can ask ourselves is "Is there a
god?" Two possibilities ~ yes or no ~ and in the absence of any other
observations they have an equal chance of being true. So, we look around at life
on earth and we say "This came about by chance and random evolution from
the primeval swamp (odds against: several billion?) or it evolved with a little
god-like help (and we already know that there is fifty/fifty chance that god
exists)." Do you believe in god? Do you have a pension plan?
The next question, assuming that god exists, is where do we fit in? You could
write a book on that (in fact I have: O Lanoo! ~ published by Findhorn Press),
so sticking to basics let’s start with: "is there some kind of existence
after the death of our physical bodies?" Again, there are two possibilities
~ yes or no. So there is at least a one in four chance that a god exists and
that death is not the end. As that is as likely as my chance of living to the
age of 75 I am happy to live my life on that premise.
I make no apology for believing that there is some purpose to our individual
lives. Without some kind of a soul why would we behave differently to animals?
Why do we make sacrifices to help others? Why are we moved by art, or music, or
the birth of a baby? No proof, bit there is a pretty good chance that there is a
god of some kind and there is some part of us that lives on after death. Next
question: is death followed by a choice of heaven or hell based on a single
life, or do we experience a series of re-births which gradually mould our
destiny? In the scheme of things, all lives are rather short measures for
eternity, and in that context some would be unfairly short. It seems much more
sensible to believe that I will experience many reincarnations as my destiny
unfolds within God’s greater plan.
Belief through probability
I am not suggesting that my conclusion should be your conclusion. But if we
believe without proof then we can at least subject the basic elements of our
belief system to the law of probability. If someone offers you a life insurance
policy that pays out only if you reach the age of 200 you wouldn’t buy it.
Don’t buy a belief that is just as unlikely. But if your beliefs pass the
probability test you don’t need to justify them to anyone else and you don't
need proof. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, and once you have eaten
it there is nothing left.
© Harvey Tordoff
December 1999