Bigger-Picture Windows on the
world Essays |
Whither Party Politics?
The last millennium has seen
many forms of government, and with the benefit of hindsight we can see some of
the successes and failures. Perhaps the various systems can be broadly divided
into those where power was imposed (by a monarch, a dictator, a church or a
party etc.) and those where power has been given to the people. Whichever system
we examine we have to admit that there are flaws.
The First Question
Recent years have seen questions asked of some traditionally-held views. Should
Britain opt for proportional representation? How far should devolution go?
Should Britain abolish hereditary peers in its Upper House? Should Australia
become a Republic and sever connections with the Crown? But the first question
should be even more fundamental. What is the best form of government and how can
that be achieved with the resources available to us at the beginning of a new
millennium?
There is an old Hermetic axiom 'as above so below'. Which simple means that we
can learn about the behaviour of galaxies by studying atomic physics; we can
learn about social intercourse by studying family dynamics. By the same token,
social development can be compared to psychological development. As the child
needs to be parented, so a simple people need to be governed: a wise and benign
monarch or dictator to nurture them in peace, an aggressive and cunning general
to defend them in war. For much of the second millennium uneducated peasants
benefitted from such government. Unfortunately, the people also had to suffer
under many leaders who were weak, selfish and cruel. All forms of government
work in theory, but in practice they tend to be undone by the vagaries of human
nature.
Coming of Age
However, the Human Race has now moved beyond childhood, and in recent
centuries democratic nations have enjoyed a degree of self-government. In the
same way, a teen-ager might still be dependent on his parents but takes part in
deciding the rules governing his own behaviour. Accepting that he does not have
the experience or wisdom to decide his own destiny he allows his representatives
(his parents) to make some decisions for him. But now, for the most part, we are
educated, articulate and have access to knowledge. In this era of technology and
information the world is ready to 'come of age'.
Churchill once said: "Democracy is the worst form of Government except all
those other forms that have been tried from time to time". In theory, at
least, democracy grants the individual the right to make his or her own
decisions. Representatives are elected, public debates are held, and voting
takes place. In most modern democracies the powers of the elected parliament are
curbed to some extent by the presence of a monarchy or an upper house.
Increasingly, however, this vital counterbalance has become more and more
symbolic. Ironically, having stripped the monarchy of all real power, the people
then begin to question its relevance. In a climate where politicians repeatedly
demonstrate greed, self-interest, weak morals and poor judgment, it might be
better to give more power to the monarchy, not less.
Flaws of the Present System
Although there are many specific areas (health care, transport, education,
policing, etc.) with apparently insoluble problems, our multi-party democracies
fail on two general points. The voter is not always in a position to make
informed rational decisions, and the elected representative is not always able
or prepared to vote as the individuals in his constituency would wish. These
points have to be examined if we are to improve on the last millennium.
The present system calls for infrequent elections at which a proportion of those
eligible seek out a polling booth and register their votes. They have a limited
choice, basically between two or three parties. With this single vote, for a
single representative of a single party, the citizen has to declare his wishes
on all issues, from foreign policy to fox hunting. If he cannot find one of the
main parties whose policies coincide with all his wishes on all aspects of
society he has to compromise some of his principles or choose not to vote at
all. Low turnouts might not be about apathy; they might be a direct result of
the frustration felt by voters at the lack of options.
Time for Revolution
It is time for a political revolution. In the past the only way in which
decision-making could be granted to the people was by some form of
representation. We now have the technology for a more direct approach. Each
citizen could be allowed to vote on specific issues. With the current state of
telecommunications it should be possible for every household to possess the
equipment necessary to register direct votes. The few who are excluded from
household telecommunications could be given access to equipment in public
buildings such as libraries.
This should not happen overnight but by political evolution, rather than
revolution. It would have to start with a small number of referendums each year
and our elected representatives would have to devise means by which information
regarding options could be disseminated. Issues would need to be clearly
defined, separated into their constituent parts, and possible ramifications
identified (a move which would benefit our present confused debates!).
Gradually, as we became more discerning and aware, the balance of power would
shift towards the people. For the first time we would have a true democracy.
The End of Party Politics
Our politicians are fond of chastising us for not embracing the potential of
modern technology. Perhaps it is time for them to show courage and bring
government into the electronic age. Just as parents have to prepare their
children for life and then step back, so the politicians would bring about their
own demise. Ultimately, of course, the system of party politics would become
redundant. Whither party politics? To the scrap heap! Who, other than the
politicians, would mourn its passing?
© Harvey Tordoff
February 2000